<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think Like a User</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwphill3.com/2006/12/11/think-like-a-user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwphill3.com/design/think-like-a-user/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:19:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J Phill</title>
		<link>http://www.jwphill3.com/design/think-like-a-user/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>J Phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwphill3.com/2006/12/11/think-like-a-user/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Exactly, and 37s is a very good example of this. And yes even though I &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; know the jargon that they could possibly use, I really don&#039;t care, I just want a good product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, and 37s is a very good example of this. And yes even though I <em>do</em> know the jargon that they could possibly use, I really don&#8217;t care, I just want a good product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rik Lomas</title>
		<link>http://www.jwphill3.com/design/think-like-a-user/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Rik Lomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwphill3.com/2006/12/11/think-like-a-user/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. You can see how the leading &quot;Web 2.0&quot; teams, such as 37signals, don&#039;t use any jargon on their sites. They are much more about the user experience: &quot;Simple software to help you get organized&quot; rather than the latest buzzwords to try and sell to technology investors. No mention of Ajax, Rails or any kind of technology that would confuse the less savvy user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. You can see how the leading &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; teams, such as 37signals, don&#8217;t use any jargon on their sites. They are much more about the user experience: &#8220;Simple software to help you get organized&#8221; rather than the latest buzzwords to try and sell to technology investors. No mention of Ajax, Rails or any kind of technology that would confuse the less savvy user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
