<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Writers on the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwphill3.com/2008/05/07/for-writers-on-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwphill3.com/writing/for-writers-on-the-web/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:19:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.jwphill3.com/writing/for-writers-on-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-12470</link>
		<dc:creator>J Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwphill3.com/?p=129#comment-12470</guid>
		<description>Shauna, maybe I am biased because I learned to write for the web first, before learning about writing in print, therefore is seems much easier. It may be a challenge for those writing in mostly print, but essentially, you&#039;re just conveying the same message in less words, and that isn&#039;t what seems that hard if you &lt;em&gt;actually&lt;/em&gt; learn/train yourself to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shauna, maybe I am biased because I learned to write for the web first, before learning about writing in print, therefore is seems much easier. It may be a challenge for those writing in mostly print, but essentially, you&#8217;re just conveying the same message in less words, and that isn&#8217;t what seems that hard if you <em>actually</em> learn/train yourself to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shauna</title>
		<link>http://www.jwphill3.com/writing/for-writers-on-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-12469</link>
		<dc:creator>Shauna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwphill3.com/?p=129#comment-12469</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree when you say that writing for the web isn&#039;t that tough. While it&#039;s not rocket science, there are a good handful of people who simply are not good writers. Then there are the good writers, who aren&#039;t used to/trained in how to infuse their copy with enticing language. Those are my favorite people! :)

I read the Rutledge article and I like the point he makes. (Though, I have to admit, I skimmed BOTH articles before allowing myself to read them more in depth.) Textual design and variance certainly helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree when you say that writing for the web isn&#8217;t that tough. While it&#8217;s not rocket science, there are a good handful of people who simply are not good writers. Then there are the good writers, who aren&#8217;t used to/trained in how to infuse their copy with enticing language. Those are my favorite people! <img src='http://www.jwphill3.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I read the Rutledge article and I like the point he makes. (Though, I have to admit, I skimmed BOTH articles before allowing myself to read them more in depth.) Textual design and variance certainly helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
