July 12th, 2006

3 Comments

Graduating From 800

For awhile now, and with various projects, I’ve been debating when would be the best time to try out a design that exceeds the standard 800×600. There has been much talk about it, and you already see it happeneing. Now of course you have to take into context the actual project goal and content, because maybe it won’t be worth it for a small brochure site.

I was reading a really good article from Warpspire today and it make me think a little more about this whole issue of exceeding the 800×600. Anyways, he used Mint as an example of how they took it into their own hands to create a great prodcut, however, it does not work with IE. And although that’s a pretty big deal, the application is a huge success.

Now the thing that I thought from the Mint example was this; what if Mint became extremely huge outside of the design world and somehow became essential to use for websites. Wouldn’t there then be a following of browsers to get their engines to support this browser to make sure that it works? Sort of like how this whole CSS thing started, and now by the time IE7 comes out, it will work with CSS alot better than it does now.

The point that I am trying to make is that someone has to be the innovator. That’s how trends start. Someone does something, and the rest follow suit. There is no big announcement. You won’t see a special on CNN about designers forgetting about 800×600 and moving up. And like I said, it really depends on the kind of site you are doing, but it seems as though peope are waiting around for this thing to blow up instead of diving right in. Of course people still have small screen resolutions but you know what, they need to keep up with techonology like the rest of us, so sometimes you just need an upgrade.

Tags: Design

3 Comments

  • I hear ya. Someone has to lead the charge, but it won’t be a single individual. It will have to be a collective decision on the part of some organization, be it a website or web design firm. Imagine what would happen if ESPN.com suddenly ported over to 1024×768! How many men would rush to get a new monitor? Maybe not many, but some would. The point is, we have to work together to cause the scales to tip.

  • Tyler, I don’t know if you’ve check espn.com lately but the width of their page is about 990px. Alot of the bigger sites are starting to do it though, like Microsoft and Motorola. 800×600 is really old news, but we wouldn’t be practicing web standards if we didn’t accomadate as many users as possible.

  • Ive always been a fan of narrow column layouts. I find them attractive and elegant. As a bonus they also happen to be easier to design and naturally accessible for the folks on low resolution monitors or mobile phones. I must admin being impressed by a new wave of Javascript-based implementations such as Ramstein’s website (http://rammstein.com) though, whose layout changes to fit best around the screen size of the client’s browser. The only time I use fluid are on very functionality-driven websites, such as ecommerce shops and admin panels, etc. Think ill be using 800×600 for a little while yet though otherwise…